Mesorat%20hashas for Sanhedrin 63:4
דיני ממונות מחזירין בין לזכות בין לחובה דיני נפשות מחזירין לזכות ואין מחזירין לחובה
BOTH FOR A ACQUITTAL AND FOR CONDEMNATION; WHILST IN CAPITAL CHARGES THE VERDICT MAY BE REVERSED FOR ACQUITTAL ONLY, BUT NOT FOR CONDEMNATION; WHILST IN CAPITAL CHARGES THE VERDICT MAY BE REVERSED FOR ACQUITTAL ONLY, BUT NOT FOR CONDEMNATION. IN MONETARY CASES, ALL<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even the pupils, those seated behind the judges for the purpose of filling up vacancies. Cf. infra 37a. ');"><sup>7</sup></span> MAY ARGUE FOR OR AGAINST THE DEFENDANT; WHILST IN CAPITAL CHARGES, ANYONE MAY ARGUE IN HIS FAVOUR, BUT NOT AGAINST HIM. IN CIVIL SUITS, HE WHO HAS ARGUED FOR CONDEMNATION, MAY<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On finding his arguments erroneous. ');"><sup>8</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Sanhedrin 63:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.